THE DRESS MELANIA WORE AT MURABBA PALACE WOULD HAVE FASHION CRITICS DO A DOUBLE TAKE!

Close ×
Categories: Fashion Style

Comments

  1. Marcos Aanderud
    Marcos Aanderud 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    Melania is fit to be a queen. It's a breath of fresh air to watch a lady who has poise and who walks so elegantly. She is comfortable because she knows etiquette. You can tell that she studies the protocol seriously before every event, so as to do everything perfectly. She is meticulous. Unlike Michelle Obama, Melania doesn't have to act like she is the First Lady; She is the first lady, and crown of the President. what admiration; what respect; with what ease she converses with the Pope in Italian and other heads of state in their "Madre Lingua" (native tongue). She shook the hand of the Saudi King which no woman had ever done, including the Obama lady; and she was admired, respected, and accepted by all, though she never covered her head. Everybody loved her just the way she was. Viva Melania!

    Reply this comment
  2. tiaan67
    tiaan67 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    without speaking a word she did more for enslaved muslim women than all the first ladies before her.
    Most powerfull handshake ever.

    Reply this comment
  3. sharon fain
    sharon fain 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    At least she didn't wear a sun dress like former Michelle Michael lol we never could tell except she could have whacked baracaanytime lol

    Reply this comment
  4. julia meares
    julia meares 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    Fuschia means in Hebrew-flesh-man-Adam-Esau-Edom. Someone did their homework when picking this particular color in this particular country as well as White for purity which was worn in Israel. Praise God for all blessings flow! Watch therefore for the time of Christ Jesus our Lord and Savior's Return is near!!! Pray without ceasing and for all things that concern you. He Listens and answers all prayers. Glorify the Coming King of Kings and Lord of Lords!!! love, julia

    Reply this comment
  5. Carol
    Carol 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    Absolutely beautiful and appropriate! Immodesty is not appreciated in the Middle East. Nice to see a woman who has the common sense to realize this.

    Reply this comment
  6. Andra Bryan
    Andra Bryan 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    Beautiful Lady!!!

    Reply this comment
  7. Georgia Moreno
    Georgia Moreno 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    Classy So elegant real first lady.Ivanka elegant darling of America.I pray they get excellent rest afterwards their tour.

    Reply this comment
  8. Ray Diamond
    Ray Diamond 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    she is total class

    Reply this comment
  9. HUCK stir
    HUCK stir 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    if she wanted to truly send a message she would have worn the same outfit as she wore in Israel. . That would have sent a very big message to the saudis

    Reply this comment
  10. biffle ford
    biffle ford 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    awesome I know every Saudi women would like to wear that in their own parties all women parties

    Reply this comment
  11. Sara Price
    Sara Price 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    JESUS CHRIST is coming soon be ready for the great day. God bless our President.

    Reply this comment
  12. Summer Love
    Summer Love 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    LOVE MY PRESIDENT AND FLOTUS! She's so gorgeous! i love, love her dress!

    Reply this comment
  13. Jeanette Morandini
    Jeanette Morandini 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    Melania was elegant and stunning and respectful in all the situations I have seen..Well done Melania

    Reply this comment
  14. TheRuralgal
    TheRuralgal 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    Simply elegant.

    Reply this comment
  15. Connie B.
    Connie B. 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    Soooooooooooo elegant and love the color. But as always the jealous hordes are not happy no matter what she does. Get out of your hate state and lighten up for once!

    Reply this comment
  16. Immaculate Heart
    Immaculate Heart 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    Nothing wrong with her dress, you stupid people get some brains and find the serious things to talk about not a woman dress. Grown up and be intelligent people, folks.

    Reply this comment
  17. BobPDXz
    BobPDXz 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    So What! ManShell Mandingo wore a black widow sider dress at her POS fake husbands first inauguration…

    Reply this comment
  18. de Blauwe Eikel
    de Blauwe Eikel 31 May, 2017, 20:31

    leaked dutch secret service about trump info!!! — Wednesday 22 March 2017 · Read 4 minutes Share information FBI indeed from the Netherlands Three anonymous sources reveal a tip about the service in the Netherlands by contacting Trump employees with Russians to Washington. BY HUIB MODERN COOL For a moment, the Netherlands was constantly speculating about US President Donald Trump and Russia. But as soon as it was, it disappeared again. On March 2, The New York Times reported that the Netherlands provided information to US services about meetings between Russian officials and confidants of former presidential candidate Trump. That would be explosive: what the nature of the conversations was, these kind of covert meetings could mean the end of Trump as president. Then it kept quiet. See you Monday. FBI Director Comey confirmed that his department conducted research into 'any link between individuals belonging to the Trump campaign and the Russian government'. This also raises questions about the role played by the Netherlands. Did the story beat in The New York Times? If so, who provided the information and what information was it? That's complicated. It is likely that the Americans received information from the AIVD or the military intelligence service MIVD, but these secret services do not want to talk about it. Also not off the record. Sharing information with allies is state confidentiality. Nevertheless, there is something to be said about the role of the Netherlands. Besides the AIVD and MIVD, many people are already actively involved. Those who do not work at a secret service, but who sometimes run in their vicinity. Think of government officials working closely with secret services, political advisors and government officials. Two well-imported Dutch sources are prepared to give clues. This also applies to a US source that can get information from American intelligence sources, trampled. These three sources agree on a number of issues. First of all: The information in The New York Times was correct. The Netherlands delivered at some point – even before Trump president – in fact information to the Americans about a meeting between someone who was in contact with the Trump campaign and Russians. Secondly, the information is provided by a secret service. So not by foreign affairs or the police, as suggested in various media. The Dutch sources also say that the AIVD is poached that the information has been leaked through US sources. That makes it likely that the information is provided by the AIVD. The annoyance with this service is explained. The gathering of information is a precarious process whereby spies need to be taken care of. They must infiltrate on a network or tempt someone to spy in their own circle. Targeting targets is also a possibility. Secret services do not want their work to be on the streets. That would reveal their information position and endanger an operation. This information then leaks is therefore not done. In terrorism cases it is different from ordinary information. In addition, it is quite common for American services to disclose information, but always after consultation with 'Zoetermeer' – which is headquartered in the AIVD. Now that other information and other permissions are made, it says everything about the political struggle in the United States between secret services and President Trump. The Dutch sources claim that the AIVD shared the information at the request of the Americans. That seems logical: since July, the FBI has been investigating the links between Trump faith and the Russians, watching a variety of people. Whether that service has made the request and what the FBI's request was unknown is unknown. The sources are not clear about the content of the information. The US source suggests that the meeting was not in Amsterdam or at Schiphol. That would have been too predictable. Dutch sources do not know or do not want to say that. Well, one of them says that it's not as big as the New York Times suggests. This may mean that it is not about senior officials or that the meeting was not so striking, for example, if the interviewees encountered each other more often. The sources are divided into the type of information. Two say that it is about human intelligence – information collected from and through persons as a source, probably by following and observing. The other means that it is about signal intelligence, information from electronic sources, for example by tapping phones. Finally, Dutch sources seem likely that the information is derived from regular AIVD research into Russian activities in the Netherlands. The AIVD has released more analysts and agents in recent years to hurt Russian espionage

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply